Fem1

Upon analyzing "the theory of man" I found it to be false.

I am not a wo+man --I am a fem

I am not fe+male --I am feme

I am not a hu+man --I am a sapien

The basic arguments refuting the theory of man:
Fact: Being man only entails being male.
1, Adding 'wo' does not change the meaning of man. The sound 'wo' cannot make man ALSO entail being "not male." So, 'wo'man is a man who is not a man. This is pure nonsense.
2, Adding 'hu' does not change the meaning of man. 'Hu'man pretends to cover a man who is a man and 'a man' who is not a man, making us accept contradiction. The theory of man, man consists of man and woman is false in two of its premisses. Therefore, the theory of man is false. They teach illogic and this illogic makes us embrace irrationality.

My Online Life is to respect the facts evident in reality. I

Right now I have no favorite chat rooms. But I would like to hear from you. My e-mail address is fem1f1@aol.com. Name subject as 'Argument' when writing or I will not reply.

I advocate rationality through the rational symbol.

My favorite books are Language and the Pursuit of Truth and Thinking with Concepts both by John Wilson, Reason and Analysis by Brand Blanshard, and other books along similar lines

My Favorite Links

Download AOL Instant Messenger