Things You Should Have Heard More About
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Things You Should Have Heard More About
|
|
|
KAL 007 - a provoked shootdown accompanied by fighters also shot down.
Incident at Sakhalin: The True Mission of KAL Flight 007. By Michel Brun.
This probably out of print book should be read, try interlibrary loan.
Shows evidence US was using KAL 007 and some fighters in a provocation that led
to the shootdown. Not only that, they lied about the actual location of the crash.
Whose idea would it have been to do this? I would guess the Nazi SS element the US
State Department and intelligence community smuggled in, altering the
files of war criminals to make them acceptable, as anti-communist specialists.
Maybe one of these advisors was angling for a WW III? Or someone who was mentored by such a person?
Books proving this wild assertion, about US complicity in the escape of war criminals,
incl. these:
"Blowback" by Christopher Simpson (NOT the recent book of same title about
something entirely else, by someone else._
"The Belarus Secret" by John Loftus, federal prosecutor who was locating
and deporting a few of these, and found they were the tip of an iceberg. (Remember the 1980's scandal about this?)
Use http://www.google.com to find Dave Emory's page, there is a reading list there.
|
|
|
|
Mysterious investors knew Word Trade Center would be hit Sep. 11.
And after a brief flurry about this, lies and silence. For example,
FACT: Major option "puts" that KLM airline stock would go DOWN after
Sep. 11, and 100's of millions of dollars of similar stock "betting"
on the major transcontinental ad intercontinental
airlines, like American Airlines,
and on some insurance and reinsurance companies' stock.
But shortly later we hear that there was no such trading done Sept. 10 of KLM stock.
Which says nothing about the several
days BEFORE that, when most of this went on, or about other airlines.
I had noticed a brief reference in the news, which then went quiet on this.
Then a professor I occasionally call up, a member of a world famous think tank,
drew my attention to this matter.
This guy says he finds out more about what is going on when travelling outside
the USA, which is partly why he does so, than here where the public is lied to
and somehow or other some things don't get that much press attention.
There are two pages that tell which urban legends and wild tales are true or false. http://www.google.com search term "urban legends" and "KLM." the one I looked at
called this one...TRUE.
Supporting sources cited on that page, are:
Schoolman, Judith. "Probe of Wild Market Swings in Terror-Tied Stocks."
[NEW YORK] DAILY NEWS. Sept. 20, 2001 p. 6.
Toedtman, James and Zehren, Charls. "Profiting from Terror?" NEWSDAY.
Sept. 19, 2002 p. W39.
Carpenter, Dave. "Options Exchange Probing Reports of Unusual Trading
Before Attacks." THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Sept. 18, 2001.
I also saw abstracts of articles from THE WASHINGTON POST that
said the same.
A link you can look at on this is http://www.apfn.org/apfn/knowledge.htm
The same person who drew my attention to this being suppressed,
also drew my attention to the following:
|
|
|
|
"These are not our sons" - WTC hijackers used ID of murdered men?
The families of the men who are allegedly the dead hijackers have
gone about with photos and so forth and they say they don't know
about all this, that these aren't their sons. There would be some
police interviews with a suspect involved who would give a bio that
when checked out resulted in things like, a person such as a teacher
of him in college or something recognizing the name, but not the photo
or description.
But the men they claimed to be existed. Where are they? Murdered by
fellow self righteous supposed Moslems, probably justifying this
as not killing real Moslems so okay, because these guys were
living and studying abroad? These murders would ensure that no
last minute embarassing things like the real owner of the used
ID would turn up.
When the TV would shows these families with photos of the men,
they were speaking in Arabic and that was easily left untranslated
and unexplained, and the exact issue, that they did not recognize
these men as being their sons, was not made clear by the news I saw. More
like the implication that they didn't recognize this as characteristic
behavior, not that they didn't recognize them at all. If this point
was made, it was briefly, no follow up, and silence on the matter
thereafter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My Favorite Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
page created with 1-2-3 Publish
|
|
