|
Frequently
Asked Questions
In my forays
into cyberspace I have received many e-mails over the years and a good
proportion of them ask me the same thing. So, despite the fact that there are
many better atheist FAQ’s on the Internet that this one, I decided to create
my own. What follows is a compellation of the more common questions that I keep
getting:
Please
note: many of these links will take you off-site. Also, keep scrolling, the
FAQ is lengthy!
Q-
Why bother? Who cares? No one cares about this stuff, etc., etc.
A-
I do and so do many others. Moreover, I find freethought, atheism, religions, and
philosophy to be both fascinating and educational. Some people do crossword
puzzles or play trivia games. I read and write about these topics in my spare
time.
Q-
Why do you criticize religions? You shouldn't criticize religion because it
does a lot of good...many of it's adherents are good people and do good things.
Are you anti-religious? Do you hate Christians? Etc., etc., etc.
A-
See the separate FAQ found HERE
for answers to these questions.
Q-
Why should I believe anything that you write?
A-
You shouldn't. I would recommend that you be critical of everything that
you read or hear--including what I write. Thus,
I would encourage
you to read How
to Think About Weird Things by Theodore Schick and Lewis Vaughn.
This
book presents a very practical approach that non-experts can use to evaluate
all sorts of claims. This, of course, includes the claims that I make in any
of my online writings. In addition, I would be VERY critical of any Internet
source, period.
Q-
Do you believe in the existence of gods? Does God exist? Etc., etc.
A- In a word: no. First, the question "Does God exist?" is meaningless unless the word
"God" has been defined. Most people who ask this question simply
assume that everyone knows what "God" means (usually the Christian
version), but this understanding involves a whole host of presupposed
concepts/conclusions (e.g., full omniscience, limited omniscience, full
omnipotence, limited omnipotence, omnipresence, a definition based on your
religion’s version of God, etc., etc.) which make the question extremely
loaded. This is part of the reason that I believe the term to be epistemically
nonsensical. Moreover, since I primarily trust evidence that is based on natural
means (i.e., the scientific method), how can I believe in something that, by its
very nature, is said to be beyond science (i.e., supernatural)?
Q: What are your
basic beliefs?
A: I'm an atheist who,
for the most part, follows a humanistic philosophy. To be specific, I am a weak atheist if we are
discussing some "unknown entity" that is alleged to exist somewhere in
the universe, and I am a strong atheist in regards to all of the gods of
humanity (e.g. Odin, Allah, Christ, etc.).
However,
it should be noted again that I do not assert with absolute certainty that a God does
not exist. In fact, this is yet another misconception that many people have
about atheists.
Finally, most common dictionaries do NOT do these terms justice.
To this end I recommend the Encyclopedia of Unbelief by Gordon
Stein and Austine Cline's
Defining Atheism page. These resources do an
excellent job of explaining how freethinkers and atheist
philosophers use most of these terms.
Q-
What evidence do you accept?
A-
Generally, I like to base my opinions on the methodology of science.
Simply put: conclusions must conform to the evidence. This, of course, is in
direct opposition to theology where evidence is made to conform to presupposed
conclusions. For an expanded account of what I base my beliefs on, please see here
or see Michael Shermer’s Skeptical
Manifesto.
Q-
Where did all "this" come from? All "this" is not an
accident, etc., etc.
A-
See the Argument
to Design.
Q-
You would have to know everything to say that there is no God.
A-
No, this is not true. In fact, outside of certain historical, scientific, and
mathematical facts, very few things can be proven with absolute certainty.
Hopefully,
what most people do is try to examine the available evidence and then make a
well-informed decision. Moreover, many people believe many things without total
knowledge of a matter. For example, many Christians believe that their religion
is the one true religion yet they have not examined any of the world's other
religions. In fact, there are thousands of gods and goddesses (e.g., see Lurker's
Dictionary
of Gods) yet how many Christians have have honestly examined all of
them? In short, I could say the same thing to Christians: "You would
have to know everything to say that the God of Christianity exists."
Finally, for a more sophisticated answer to this question, see Atheism
& Omniscience
by Austine Cline.
Q-
You worship Darwin, science, Darwinism, etc., etc.
A-
I'm not sure why I keep getting this comment. Although I do adhere to the method
of science I never have wrote anything about Darwin. I suspect that it has something
to do with the next question. Whatever the case, please see the Fallacy of
Equivocation.
Q-
Atheists still have faith, atheists believe in something, etc., etc.
A-
See the Fallacy of
Equivocation.
Q- Aren't
you afraid that you'll go to hell?
A- First,
which version of hell (Christian, Muslim, etc.) are you talking about? Second:
No. The evidence suggests that hell is a myth. See: Mythologies Last Gods by
William Harwood.
Q: What
do you think happens to you after you die?
A- I have no
idea--I’m not omniscient.
Q-
Are you trying to convert believers into atheists?
A-
No. I’m trying to get believers to think critically about why
they believe what they believe--if we happen to reach different
conclusions that’s fine with me.
Q-
Do atheists hate God? You hate God, etc., etc.
A-
Atheists lack belief in a God or gods. Moreover, most atheists do not believe in
the supernatural either. So, how can I hate that which I don’t believe exists?
Q-
How can you be critical of religion when so many intelligent and well-educated
people believe in God?
A- Truth,
falsehood and the validity of a hypothesis is not decided by a majority opinion.
For example, at one time the majority believed that slavery was acceptable and
the world was flat, yet in both cases the majority was wrong. In addition, many
intelligent people are adherents of many different religions (Judaism, Islam,
etc.) yet they all can’t be right.
Q- What
is the meaning of life for an atheist? How can your life have meaning without
God? Etc., etc.
A- To quote Bertrand
Russell: “what do you mean by the meaning of life?” Further, my
life does have meaning and I have to say that I am as happy now (maybe even more
so) as I was when I was a Christian. Finally, I’ll refer you to following
offsite
explanation of this very common question.
Q-
If you don't believe in god, what stops you from going out and murdering and
performing other evil acts?
A-
A respect for the laws of a democratic society, the respect for all life, and
the fear of imprisonment.
Q:
Atheists are Communists, the atheistic philosophy fails, atheism is a worldview,
etc., etc.
A:
First, Soviet Communism was a system of government that required state-mandated
atheism. The fact of the matter is that there were atheists in ancient Greece
well before Communism was ever thought of, so suggesting that atheism and Communism
are one and the same is simply wrong. See: Godless
Communists: Atheism and Society in Soviet Russia by William Husband.
Second, atheism
is just a factual premise and nothing more. Atheism addresses one question and
one question only: does God exist? It says nothing about how I am to
live my life. Moreover there is not one uniform set of atheistic morals/beliefs/worldviews/philosophies
and stating otherwise is both wrong and ignorant.
Unfortunately,
some Christians (i.e., apologists) usually try to attack atheism (i.e., the
belief that there is no God) by attacking a particular (and usually famous)
atheist and his/her respective philosophy or worldview. Karl
Marx, Bertrand Russell, George Carlin, Bruce Lee, Isaac Asimov, Friedrich Nietzsche,
Dan Barker, Ronald Reagan Jr., and Paul Kurtz are all atheists yet I
am certain that their worldviews are all very different. Moreover, many of the
reasons that they choose not to believe in god are also likely very different.
Simply put,
the only thing that all atheists agree on is that there is no God, period.
Q- What
kind of horrible experience did you have that caused you to become an atheist?
Atheists
are just mad at religion/pastors/church, etc., etc.
A-
The experiences that I had when I was
deeply involved in the church are no better or worse than anything that has
happened to me since becoming an atheist. While
it is true that some atheists are angry, I am not one of them. In addition,
even if there are atheists who are angry you should ask yourself: what are they
angry about and do they have a right to be angry? Although anger has the potential
to bias any argument or belief, you should critically evaluate their
claim or claims before dismissing them outright. Finally, whether I am angry
or not has NOTHING to do with answering this question: does God exist?
In fact, dismissing all atheists as angry at religion only evades the issue
at hand. For a good explanation of this, and other typical “atheist questions”
see the following FAQ that is brought to you by
Austin
Cline.
For a good
list of common theistic/atheistic arguments see Does
God Exist? For
a summary of logical fallacies see the Logical
Fallacies FAQ.
HOME |