NEW YORK, Sept. 26, 2002 -- The United States should launch an attack to remove Saddam Hussein from power if it is convinced the Iraqi president is manufacturing weapons of mass destruction.
The key to taking such an action is proof that nuclear, chemical and biological weapons are being developed in Iraq. Not simple suspicion or nonspecific intelligence reports from the U.S. and Great Britain that claim Iraq has ability to deliver such weapons but persuasive physical evidence that can be shown to the American people.
When President Kennedy ordered a 1962 naval blockade of Cuba – preventing Russian ships from delivering possible missile equipment to its Cold War ally – he had persuasive evidence, satellite photos of apparent Cuban missile bases under construction that could have aimed nuclear missiles at the U.S.
We need that type of evidence before we move in and take out Saddam Hussein.
Judging by his past performance, the Iraqi president merits harsh measures:
1) The U.S. and its allies launched the Persian Gulf War in 1991 to repell his invasion of neighboring Kuwait.
2) Hussein agreed to destroy weapons of mass destruction as a condition of ending that war and to allow international weapons inspections to prove he had done so.
3) He did not allow inspectors unfettered access to possible weapons sites then and there is little reason to believe he would now, despite his recent announcement that he would.
The United Nations should respond to Hussein’s offer and send a team of inspectors to determine the truth of the U.S. claims or Iraq’s denials of weapon making.
The results of that inspection or other independently obtained evidence of weapon making should determine whether we attack.
Unfortunately, the U.S. does not have time on its side.
Terrorists have declared a holy war and the U.S. has evidence, according to U.S. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, that Iraq has provided some of them with chemical weapon training.
In an era of suicide bombers, it would be relatively easy for an Al Qaeda member to enter the U.S. hiding a tiny vile of bacteria, a biochemical weapon. It wouldn’t even set off metal detectors.
Most civilized nations don’t use chemical or biological weapons because they can backfire big time if the wind blows the wrong way, killing all sides in a war.
But Hussein is not a brilliant man; he is a vicious one.
And just as we cage a vicious dog before it bites, the U.S. should deal with Saddam Hussein before he deals with us.