Reply to Bobby Mink's letter
However, I believe there may be some disparity around Special Rate payments. In your letter you state, "The average special rate of foster care in Oregon is $580.75 per child per month. It should be noted that approximately 56% (or 3,000) of the foster children in foster care receive reimbursement through the special rate program. These payments are in addition to the base rates noted above". I do not disagree with the statement as such. I do, however, disagree with the inference of that statement.
While it may be true that 56% (or 3,000) foster children in Oregon receive special rates, and the average special rate payment equals $580.75, it is not necessarily true that 56% of foster parents receive special rate payments in addition to their base rate! I would like to make the following five observations:
1) Although 56% of the children in foster care may receive special rate, that does not correlate to 56% of foster parents receiving special rate payments. I would be very interested in seeing the actual percentage of overall foster providers receiving special rate payments. 2) In my experience, foster parents who care for special needs children often care for more than one special needs child. This leads to certain families receiving extremely high overall payments, while new or inexperienced foster parents, unaware of the special rate system, often care for special needs children without receiving any special rate.
3) The special rate, although designated in policy as monies associated with the child's "special" needs, it is actually payment ($4.61/Hr.) to the foster parent for care above and beyond that necessary for a "normal" child. It is a payment for extra time, skill and services provided to the foster child by the foster parent.
4) Should a child require this high level of care [medical or behavioral] in any other setting, for example a hospital, rehabilitation center or residential facility, the cost would be substantially more than $1065.75/month, which represents the highest "base rate" plus the "average special rate" you quoted! The agency saves thousands of dollars by placing children in foster care rather than more restrictive environments.
5) There is a huge disparity in the amount of special rate payment made to individual foster parents! Although policy directs the hours, services and payment provided to the foster parent/child, experienced, skilled, knowledgeable and savvy foster parents are able to "demand" much higher amounts to care for specific children! This is often the case for children awaiting placement in residential or group home facilities. The other extreme is also apparent. As mentioned previously, "new" and/or "relative" placements often receive little or no special rate for special needs children simply because they do not know it may be available. Therefore the scale varies significantly. On one end of the scale you have the infant [with undiagnosed special needs] placed with an inexperienced or unknowing foster parent who receives only $378.00 per month. On the other end of the scale you have the experienced savvy foster provider who is capable of negotiating with the agency and demands $2000 [or more] per month for the care of a child.
It appears that the special rate system is flawed and in desperate need of change, however that is not the point of this communication. The point of this communication is that your letter seems misleading. It seems to imply that over half of all foster parents receive a substantial special rate payment in addition to their base rate payment. I do not believe that to be factual.
I believe that a significant number of foster care providers receive payments far below the estimated average monthly cost of approximately $700 [OR] for raising a child. That means the foster family absorbs much of the cost of raising these children. DHS recognizes the dedication and commitment of foster and adoptive parents! Those parents will not stop providing care for needy children simply because of pay cuts! Knowing this fact makes it exceedingly "easy" to recommend 7.5% and 10% cuts to foster and adoptive maintenance payments and special rates! It does not make it RIGHT, FAIR, REASONABLE, PRUDENT or NECESSARY!
I ask again that you find some other way to make up for budget shortfalls, advocate for legislative change that will keep us from being in this position again, and recognize the true value and importance of supporting those people directly serving Oregon's children and youth - a service which DHS is mandated to provide.